Claiming Casualty Loss Tax Deductions

Posted on
by
Reply
Claiming-Casualty-Loss-Tax-Deductions

This year, many Americans have been victimized by wildfires, severe storms, flooding, tornadoes, and other disasters. No matter where you live, unexpected disasters may cause damage to your home or personal property. But claiming a deduction has gotten more complicated. Keep reading to learn the rules for claiming casualty loss tax deductions.

Defining Casualty

What’s considered a casualty for tax purposes? A “casualty” is a sudden, unexpected, or unusual event, such as a hurricane, tornado, flood, earthquake, fire, act of vandalism, or a terrorist attack.

Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), eligible casualty loss victims could claim a deduction on their tax returns. But currently, there are restrictions that make these deductions harder to take.

The Rules and Exception

For losses incurred from 2018 through 2025, the TCJA generally eliminates deductions for personal casualty losses, except for losses due to federally declared disasters.

Note: There’s an exception to the general rule of allowing casualty loss deductions only in federally declared disaster areas. If you have personal casualty gains because your insurance proceeds exceed the tax basis of the damaged or destroyed property, you can deduct personal casualty losses that aren’t due to a federally declared disaster up to the amount of your personal casualty gains.

Claim a Refund with a Special Election

If your casualty loss is due to a federally declared disaster, a special election allows you to deduct the loss on your tax return for the preceding year and claim a refund. If you’ve already filed your return for the preceding year, you can file an amended return to make the election and claim the deduction in the earlier year. This can potentially help you get extra cash when you need it.

This election must be made no later than six months after the due date (without considering extensions) for filing your tax return for the year in which the disaster occurs. However, the election itself must be made on an original or amended return for the preceding year.

Calculating the Casualty Loss Deduction

You must take the following three steps to calculate the casualty loss deduction for personal-use property in an area declared a federal disaster:

  1. Subtract any insurance proceeds.
  2. Subtract $100 per casualty event.
  3. Combine the results from the first two steps and then subtract 10 percent of your adjusted gross income (AGI) for the year you claim the loss deduction.

Important: Another factor that makes it harder to claim a casualty loss than it was years ago is that you must itemize deductions to claim one. Through 2025, fewer people will itemize because the TCJA significantly increased the standard deduction amounts. For 2023, they’re $13,850 for single filers, $20,800 for heads of households, and $27,700 for married joint-filing couples. So, even if you qualify for a casualty deduction, you might not get any tax benefit because you don’t have enough itemized deductions.

Lawmakers Debating the Issue

Earlier this year, a bipartisan group of lawmakers in Washington introduced a bill that would make the deduction available to more taxpayers. The proposed Casualty Loss Deduction Restoration Act would reinstate the deduction to all taxpayers with a casualty loss — not just those located in a federal disaster declaration area. Passage of the bill is uncertain at this time.

We Can Help

When it comes to claiming casualty loss tax deductions, the rules described here are for personal property. Keep in mind that the rules for business or income-producing property are different and other rules may apply. As it happens, it’s easier to get a deduction for a business property casualty loss. If you’re a victim of a disaster, contact us. The knowledgeable team at Ramsay & Associates can help you understand the complex tax deduction rules.

About the author

Brady is the owner of Ramsay & Associates. He specializes in financial statement preparation and personal, fiduciary and corporate tax and accounting.

His professional experience includes seven years' experience for local and national CPA firms before joining Ramsay & Associates in 2006.

He has a Bachelor of Accounting degree from the University of Minnesota Duluth. He is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the Minnesota Society of CPA's, an Eagle Scout, as well as an active volunteer in the community.

Structuring Payable-on-Death Accounts with Your Estate Plan

Posted on
by
Reply
Structuring-Payable-on-Death-Accounts-with-Your-Estate-Plan

Payable-on-death (POD) accounts can provide a quick, simple, and inexpensive way to transfer assets outside of probate. However, some account designations may conflict with plans you already have in place. Keep reading to know what to look for — and what to avoid — when structuring payable-on-death accounts with your estate plan

Setting Up POD Accounts

POD accounts can be used for bank accounts, certificates of deposit, and even brokerage accounts. Setting one up is as easy as providing the bank with a signed POD beneficiary designation form. When you die, your beneficiaries simply need to present a certified copy of the death certificate and their identification to the bank, and the money or securities will be theirs.

Beware of Potential Pitfalls

Be aware, however, that POD accounts can backfire if they’re not coordinated carefully with the rest of your estate plan. Too often, people designate an account as POD as an afterthought without considering whether it may conflict with their wills, trusts, or other estate planning documents.

Suppose, for example, that Shannon dies with a will that divides her property equally among her three children. She also has a $50,000 bank account that’s payable on death to her oldest child. The conflict between the will and POD designation may have to be resolved in court, which will delay distribution of her estate and generate substantial attorneys’ fees.

Another potential problem with POD accounts is that if you use them for most of your assets, the assets left in your estate may be insufficient to pay debts, taxes, or other expenses. Your executor would then have to initiate a proceeding to bring assets back into the estate.

POD accounts are often used to hold a modest amount of funds that are available immediately to your executor or other representative to pay funeral expenses, bills, and other pressing cash needs while your estate is being administered. Using these accounts for more substantial assets may lead to intrafamily disputes or costly litigation.

Rely on Your Advisor

Structuring payable-on-death accounts with your estate plan can be tricky if you’re unsure of what to look for. If you use POD accounts as part of your estate plan, be sure to review the rest of your plan carefully to avoid potential conflicts. Contact the trusted professionals at Ramsay & Associates with any questions you have regarding coordinating the use of POD accounts with your estate plan. We’re always here to help.

About the author

Brady is the owner of Ramsay & Associates. He specializes in financial statement preparation and personal, fiduciary and corporate tax and accounting.

His professional experience includes seven years' experience for local and national CPA firms before joining Ramsay & Associates in 2006.

He has a Bachelor of Accounting degree from the University of Minnesota Duluth. He is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the Minnesota Society of CPA's, an Eagle Scout, as well as an active volunteer in the community.

Plan for Year-End Gifts with the Gift Tax Annual Exclusion

Posted on
by
1
Plan-for-Year-End-Gifts-with-the-Gift-Tax-Annual-Exclusion

With the holidays just around the corner, many people may want to make gifts of cash or stock to their loved ones. You can plan for year-end gifts with the gift tax annual exclusion. By properly using the annual exclusion, gifts to family members and loved ones can reduce the size of your taxable estate, within generous limits, without triggering any estate or gift tax.

Exclusion for 2023

For 2023, the exclusion amount is $17,000. The exclusion covers gifts you make to each recipient each year. Therefore, a taxpayer with three children can transfer $51,000 to the children this year free of federal gift taxes. If the only gifts made during a year are excluded in this fashion, there’s no need to file a federal gift tax return.

If annual gifts exceed $17,000, the exclusion covers the first $17,000 per recipient, and only the excess is taxable. In addition, even taxable gifts may result in no gift tax liability, thanks to the unified credit (discussed below).

Please note this discussion isn’t relevant to gifts made to a spouse because those gifts are free of gift tax under separate marital deduction rules.

Married Taxpayers Can Split Gifts

If you’re married, a gift made during a year can be treated as split between you and your spouse, even if the cash or gift property is given by only one of you. Thus, by gift-splitting, up to $34,000 a year can be transferred to each recipient by a married couple because of their two annual exclusions. For example, a married couple with three married children can transfer a total of $204,000 each year to their children and to the children’s spouses ($34,000 for each of six recipients).

If gift-splitting is involved, both spouses must consent to it. Consent should be indicated on the gift tax return (or returns) that the spouses file. The IRS prefers that both spouses indicate their consent on each return filed. Because more than $17,000 is being transferred by a spouse, a gift tax return (or returns) will have to be filed, even if the $34,000 exclusion covers total gifts. We can prepare a gift tax return (or returns) for you, if more than $17,000 is being given to a single individual in any year.

Unified Credit for Taxable Gifts

Even gifts that aren’t covered by the exclusion, and are thus taxable, may not result in a tax liability. This is because a tax credit wipes out the federal gift tax liability on the first taxable gifts that you make in your lifetime, up to $12.92 million for 2023. However, to the extent you use this credit against a gift tax liability, it reduces (or eliminates) the credit available for use against the federal estate tax at your death.

Be aware that gifts made directly to a financial institution to pay for tuition or to a health care provider to pay for medical expenses on behalf of someone else don’t count toward the exclusion. For example, you can pay $20,000 to your grandson’s college for his tuition this year, plus still give him up to $17,000 as a gift.

Annual gifts help reduce the taxable value of your estate. The estate and gift tax exemption amount is scheduled to be cut drastically in 2026 to the 2017 level when the related Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions expire (unless Congress acts to extend them). Making large tax-free gifts may be one way to recognize and address this potential threat. They could help insulate you against any later reduction in the unified federal estate and gift tax exemption.

Questions? We Can Help

As you plan for year-end gifts with the gift tax annual exclusion, you may still have questions. That’s why we’re here. The knowledgeable personal tax professionals at Ramsay & Associates can help with all your estate, trust, and gift tax concerns. Contact us today.

About the author

Brady is the owner of Ramsay & Associates. He specializes in financial statement preparation and personal, fiduciary and corporate tax and accounting.

His professional experience includes seven years' experience for local and national CPA firms before joining Ramsay & Associates in 2006.

He has a Bachelor of Accounting degree from the University of Minnesota Duluth. He is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the Minnesota Society of CPA's, an Eagle Scout, as well as an active volunteer in the community.

Tax Consequences for Divorcing Business Owners

Posted on
by
Reply
Tax-Consequences-for-Divorcing-Business-Owners

If you’re getting a divorce, you know the process is generally filled with stress. But if you’re a business owner, tax issues can complicate matters even more. Your business ownership interest is one of your biggest personal assets, and in many cases your marital property will include all or part of it. Keep reading to learn about potential tax consequences for divorcing business owners.

Transferring Property Tax-Free

In general, you can divide most assets, including cash and business ownership interests, between you and your soon-to-be ex-spouse without any federal income or gift tax consequences. When an asset falls under this tax-free transfer rule, the spouse who receives the asset takes over its existing tax basis (for tax gain or loss purposes) and its existing holding period (for short-term or long-term holding period purposes).

For example, let’s say that under the terms of your divorce agreement, you give your house to your spouse in exchange for keeping 100 percent of the stock in your business. That asset swap would be tax-free. And the existing basis and holding period for the home and the stock would carry over to the person who receives them.

Tax-free transfers can occur before a divorce or at the time it becomes final. Tax-free treatment also applies to post-divorce transfers as long as they’re made “incident to divorce.” This means transfers that occur within:

  • A year after the date the marriage ends, or
  • Six years after the date the marriage ends if the transfers are made pursuant to your divorce agreement.

Additional Future Issues

Eventually, there will be tax implications for assets received tax-free in a divorce settlement. The ex-spouse who winds up owning an appreciated asset — when the fair market value exceeds the tax basis — generally must recognize taxable gain when it’s sold (unless an exception applies).

What if your ex-spouse receives 49 percent of your highly appreciated small business stock? Thanks to the tax-free transfer rule, there’s no tax impact when the shares are transferred. Your ex will continue to apply the same tax rules as if you had continued to own the shares, including carryover basis and carryover holding period. When your ex-spouse ultimately sells the shares, he or she will owe any capital gains taxes. You will owe nothing.

Note: The person who winds up owning appreciated assets must pay the built-in tax liability that comes with them. From a net-of-tax perspective, appreciated assets are worth less than an equal amount of cash or other assets that haven’t appreciated. That’s why you should always take taxes into account when negotiating your divorce agreement.

In addition, the beneficial tax-free transfer rule is now extended to ordinary-income assets, not just to capital-gains assets. For example, if you transfer business receivables or inventory to your ex-spouse in a divorce, these types of ordinary-income assets can also be transferred tax-free. When the asset is later sold, converted to cash, or exercised (in the case of nonqualified stock options), the person who owns the asset at that time must recognize the income and pay the tax liability.

Avoid Surprises by Planning Ahead

Like many major life events, divorce can have significant tax implications. For example, you may receive an unexpected tax bill if you don’t carefully handle the splitting up of qualified retirement plan accounts, such as a 401(k) plan and IRAs. And if you own a business, the stakes are higher. If you have more questions about tax consequences for divorcing business owners, contact the business tax professionals at Ramsay & Associates. We can help you minimize the adverse tax consequences of settling your divorce.

About the author

Brady is the owner of Ramsay & Associates. He specializes in financial statement preparation and personal, fiduciary and corporate tax and accounting.

His professional experience includes seven years' experience for local and national CPA firms before joining Ramsay & Associates in 2006.

He has a Bachelor of Accounting degree from the University of Minnesota Duluth. He is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the Minnesota Society of CPA's, an Eagle Scout, as well as an active volunteer in the community.

Moving a Parent to a Nursing Home?

Posted on
by
Reply
Moving-a-Parent-to-a-Nursing-Home

According to various reports, more than a million Americans live in nursing homes. If you have a parent entering one, you’re probably not thinking about taxes. But there may be tax consequences. Let’s take a look at five potential tax implications when moving a parent to a nursing home.

Deducting Long-Term Medical Care Costs

The costs of qualified long-term care, including nursing home care, are deductible as medical expenses to the extent they, along with other medical expenses, exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI).

Qualified long-term care services are necessary diagnostic, preventive, therapeutic, curing, treating, mitigating and rehabilitative services, and maintenance or personal-care services required by a chronically ill individual that are provided under care administered by a licensed healthcare practitioner.

To qualify as chronically ill, a physician or other licensed healthcare practitioner must certify an individual as unable to perform at least two activities of daily living (eating, toileting, transferring, bathing, dressing, and continence) for at least 90 days due to a loss of functional capacity or severe cognitive impairment.

Nursing Home Payments

Amounts paid to a nursing home are deductible as medical expenses if a person is staying at the facility principally for medical, rather than custodial, care. If a person isn’t in the nursing home principally to receive medical care, only the portion of the fee that’s allocable to actual medical care qualifies as a deductible expense. But if the individual is chronically ill, all qualified long-term care services, including maintenance or personal care services, are deductible.

If your parent qualifies as your dependent, you can include any medical expenses you incur for your parent along with your own when determining your medical deduction.

Qualified Long-Term Care Insurance

Premiums paid for a qualified long-term care insurance contract are deductible as medical expenses (subject to limitations explained below) to the extent they, along with other medical expenses, exceed the percentage-of-AGI threshold. A qualified long-term care insurance contract covers only qualified long-term care services, doesn’t pay costs covered by Medicare, is guaranteed renewable, and doesn’t have a cash surrender value.

Qualified long-term care premiums are includible as medical expenses up to certain amounts. For individuals over 60 but not over 70 years old, the 2023 limit on deductible long-term care insurance premiums is $4,770, and for those over 70, the 2023 limit is $5,960.

The Sale of Your Parent’s Home

If your parent sells his or her home, up to $250,000 of the gain from the sale may be tax-free. To qualify for the $250,000 exclusion ($500,000 if married), the seller must generally have owned and used the home for at least two years out of the five years before the sale. However, there’s an exception to the two-out-of-five-year use test if the seller becomes physically or mentally unable to care for him or herself during the five-year period.

Head-Of-Household Filing Status

If you aren’t married and you meet certain dependency tests for your parent, you may qualify for head-of-household filing status, which has a higher standard deduction and lower tax rates than single filing status. You may be eligible to file as head of household even if the parent for whom you claim an exemption doesn’t live with you.

We Are Here to Help

These are only some of the tax issues you may have to contend with when moving a parent to a nursing home. If you need additional information or assistance, the professionals at Ramsay & Associates are always here to help. Contact us with questions.

About the author

Brady is the owner of Ramsay & Associates. He specializes in financial statement preparation and personal, fiduciary and corporate tax and accounting.

His professional experience includes seven years' experience for local and national CPA firms before joining Ramsay & Associates in 2006.

He has a Bachelor of Accounting degree from the University of Minnesota Duluth. He is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the Minnesota Society of CPA's, an Eagle Scout, as well as an active volunteer in the community.